Challenges of Linear Assumptions in Remote Sensing Indices

Abstract ID: 3.10140 | Accepted as Talk | Talk/Oral | TBA | TBA

Mathieu Gravey (0)
Harsh, Beria (2,3), Rumpf, Sabine (4)
Mathieu Gravey (1)
Harsh, Beria (2,3), Rumpf, Sabine (4)

1
(1) Institute for Interdisciplinary Mountain Research, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Innrai, 6020, Innsbruck, Tirol, AT
(2) WSL Institute for Snow and Avalanche Research SLF, Davos, Switzerland
(3) Department of Environmental Systems Science, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
(4) Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Basel,, Basel, Switzerland

(1) Institute for Interdisciplinary Mountain Research, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Innrai, 6020, Innsbruck, Tirol, AT
(2) WSL Institute for Snow and Avalanche Research SLF, Davos, Switzerland
(3) Department of Environmental Systems Science, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
(4) Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Basel,, Basel, Switzerland

Categories: Monitoring, Remote Sensing
Keywords: Remote Sensing, Mountain Ecosystems, Non-Linear Indices, NDVI

Categories: Monitoring, Remote Sensing
Keywords: Remote Sensing, Mountain Ecosystems, Non-Linear Indices, NDVI

The content was (partly) adapted by AI
Content (partly) adapted by AI

Remote sensing indices like NDVI are widely used to analyze vegetation, snow (NDSI), water dynamics (NDWI), … However, their non-linearity and bounded nature create challenges when applying common analytical methods such as averaging, resolution scaling, and trend estimation. These issues are particularly evident in mountainous and low-vegetation environments, where complex terrain, vegetation gradients, and seasonal variability further complicate interpretation.

This study examines how spatial and temporal averaging can misrepresent environmental patterns, how resolution choices influence index behavior, and why linear regression can produce misleading trends. We review existing methodologies, discuss their limitations, and explore how researchers have attempted to address these issues. By assessing these challenges, we aim to provide a clearer understanding of the implications of linear assumptions in remote sensing analyses.

N/A
NAME:
TBA
BUILDING:
TBA
FLOOR:
TBA
TYPE:
TBA
CAPACITY:
TBA
ACCESS:
TBA
ADDITIONAL:
TBA
FIND ME:
>> Google Maps

Limits: min. 3 words, max. 30 words or 200 characters

Choose the session you want to submit an abstract. Please be assured that similar sessions will either be scheduled consecutively or merged once the abstract submission phase is completed.

Select your preferred presentation mode
Please visit the session format page to get a detailed view on the presentation timings
The final decision on oral/poster is made by the (Co-)Conveners and will be communicated via your My#IMC dashboard

Please add here your abstract meeting the following requirements:
NO REFERNCES/KEYWORDS/ACKNOWEDGEMENTS IN AN ABSTRACT!
Limits: min 100 words, max 350 words or 2500 characters incl. tabs
Criteria: use only UTF-8 HTML character set, no equations/special characters/coding
Copy/Paste from an external editor is possible but check/reformat your text before submitting (e.g. bullet points, returns, aso)

Add here affiliations (max. 30) for you and your co-author(s). Use the row number to assign the affiliation to you and your co-author(s).
When you hover over the row number you are able to change the order of the affiliation list.

1
2
3
4
1

Add here co-author(s) (max. 30) to your abstract. Please assign the affiliation(s) of each co-author in the "Assigned Aff. No" by using the corresponding numbers from the "Affiliation List" (e.g.: 1,2,...)
When you hover over the row number you are able to change the order of the co-author list.

1
2
1
1
2
3
4
1
Close