Forest stand characteristics and salvage logging strategies affect the dynamics of post-windthrow vegetation trajectories

Abstract ID: 3.8611 | Accepted as Talk | Talk/Oral | TBA | TBA

Carlotta Grande (0)
Candotti, Anna (1), Stein, Miriam (1), Alberti, Giorgio (2), Lingua, Emanuele (3), Tomelleri, Enrico (1)
Carlotta Grande ((0) Sapienza University of Rome, Via Eudossiana, 18, 00184, Roma, Italy, IT)
Candotti, Anna (1), Stein, Miriam (1), Alberti, Giorgio (2), Lingua, Emanuele (3), Tomelleri, Enrico (1)

(0) Sapienza University of Rome, Via Eudossiana, 18, 00184, Roma, Italy, IT
(1) University of Bolzano, Piazza Università, 39100, Bolzano, Italy
(2) University of Udine, Via Palladio, 33100, Udine, Italy
(3) University of Padova, Via 8 Febbraio, 35122, Padova, Italy

(1) University of Bolzano, Piazza Università, 39100, Bolzano, Italy
(2) University of Udine, Via Palladio, 33100, Udine, Italy
(3) University of Padova, Via 8 Febbraio, 35122, Padova, Italy

Categories: Adaptation, ES-Forests, Monitoring, Remote Sensing, Sustainable Development
Keywords: remote sensing, forest recovery, wind disturbances, regeneration dynamics, salvage logging

Categories: Adaptation, ES-Forests, Monitoring, Remote Sensing, Sustainable Development
Keywords: remote sensing, forest recovery, wind disturbances, regeneration dynamics, salvage logging

The increasing frequency and intensity of windthrow events pose significant ecological, economic, and social challenges. A notable example
is storm Vaia (2018), which devastated over 42,500 ha of forest across Trentino Alto Adige, Veneto, Friuli Venezia Giulia, Lombardy,
and, to a lesser extent, Piedmont and Valle d’Aosta, with an estimated 16.5 million m³ of fallen trees. Understanding post-disturbance
forest recovery is crucial for guiding management strategies that promote resilient restoration. This study examines post-Vaia
vegetation dynamics by integrating earth observation data and field monitoring to assess regeneration trajectories. During summer
2021, field data were collected from 32 transects in affected areas of South Tyrol using a standardized protocol. The survey covered
edge forest structure, dead wood presence, and ground cover. To assess vegetation dynamics remotely, we used the Normalized Difference
Vegetation Index (NDVI) from Sentinel-2 (2016-2024) and land surface temperature (LST) from ECOSTRESS (2018-2024). Time series
analysis grouped sites based on similar recovery trajectories. Additional data from field surveys, topography, climate, and salvage
logging were integrated into a Multifactorial Analysis (MFA) to explain observed temporal patterns. The analysis identified three distinct
recovery trajectories, primarily influenced by topography, temperature, and precipitation. The pronounced seasonality in two recovery
groups suggested successional stages dominated by grasses and herbs, with limited tree regeneration, indicating slow forest recovery.
Although harvesting strategies are often guided by topography, different methods affect soil conditions and subsequent vegetation
growth. While NDVI and LST effectively captured broad recovery trends, they had limitations in detecting species-specific regeneration
and site diversity, underscoring the need for supplementary data. Our findings highlight the importance of integrating earth observations
with ground-based surveys to assess post-windthrow recovery and inform forest management. Understanding how stand characteristics
and salvage logging influence regeneration is key to optimizing intervention strategies in mountain forests. These insights support
decision-making for resilient forest restoration. Future research should expand monitoring efforts to neighbouring regions and incorporate
species-specific analyses to refine post-disturbance management.

N/A
NAME:
TBA
BUILDING:
TBA
FLOOR:
TBA
TYPE:
TBA
CAPACITY:
TBA
ACCESS:
TBA
ADDITIONAL:
TBA
FIND ME:
>> Google Maps

Limits: min. 3 words, max. 30 words or 200 characters

Choose the session you want to submit an abstract. Please be assured that similar sessions will either be scheduled consecutively or merged once the abstract submission phase is completed.

Select your preferred presentation mode
Please visit the session format page to get a detailed view on the presentation timings
The final decision on oral/poster is made by the (Co-)Conveners and will be communicated via your My#IMC dashboard

Please add here your abstract meeting the following requirements:
NO REFERNCES/KEYWORDS/ACKNOWEDGEMENTS IN AN ABSTRACT!
Limits: min 100 words, max 350 words or 2500 characters incl. tabs
Criteria: use only UTF-8 HTML character set, no equations/special characters/coding
Copy/Paste from an external editor is possible but check/reformat your text before submitting (e.g. bullet points, returns, aso)

Add here affiliations (max. 30) for you and your co-author(s). Use the row number to assign the affiliation to you and your co-author(s).
When you hover over the row number you are able to change the order of the affiliation list.

1
2
3
1

Add here co-author(s) (max. 30) to your abstract. Please assign the affiliation(s) of each co-author in the "Assigned Aff. No" by using the corresponding numbers from the "Affiliation List" (e.g.: 1,2,...)
When you hover over the row number you are able to change the order of the co-author list.

1
2
3
4
5
1
1
2
3
4
5
1
Close