
NAME:
MCI - SR 303
BUILDING:
Management Center Innsbruck
FLOOR:
3
TYPE:
Seminar Room
CAPACITY:
54
ACCESS:
Only Participants
EQUIPMENT:
Beamer, Handicapped Accessible, PC, Sound System, Whiteboard, WLAN (Eduroam), Microphones
Publishing insights from your mountain work in a peer-reviewed journal can be challenging. It requires knowledge of the current publishing landscape, an understanding of the journal’s scope and review process, as well as a solid grasp of the basic rules for structuring and writing scientific articles. Drawing on their extensive editorial experience with inter- and transdisciplinary journals and scholarly communications, the session hosts will offer useful tips and recommendations for navigating the publishing landscape. They will cover dos and don’ts when preparing a submission to a peer-reviewed journal, as well as how to respond to reviewers. The workshop is designed to facilitate experience and practice sharing among attendees and journal editors. The session is open to anyone interested in gaining insights into the perspective of journal editors, improving their scientific writing skills, and contributing to advancing a more equitable and just scholarly publishing landscape. The two not-for-profit, peer-reviewed, and open-access journals Mountain Research and Development (MRD) – dedicated to research relevant to sustainable mountain development – and eco.mont – Journal of Protected Mountain Areas Research and Management – publish innovative research and practice papers and reach a broad audience worldwide.
Once the review of the abstract is completed by the convener, this icon appears.
If at least one review has been provided by the co-conveners, this icon appears.
If at least one comment has been provided by the (co-)conveners, this icon appears.
Some conveners asked about details like length of presentations within a session etc. Please checkout details here.
IMPORTANT: The review result (of the convener) is a general suggestion to the organizing committee, which finally decides on the review. In most cases, we will follow your decisions and in case changes are needed due to organizational issues (e.g. not enough contributions for an individual poster session), we would contact you. The authors of the abstracts will not be informed immediately after you completed the review but after the end of the review phase.
We and use cookies and other tracking technologies to improve your experience on our website. We may store and/or access information on a device and process personal data, such as your IP address and browsing data, for personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development. Additionally, we may utilize precise geolocation data and identification through device scanning.
Please note that your consent will be valid across all our subdomains. You can change or withdraw your consent at any time by clicking the “Consent Preferences” button at the bottom of your screen. We respect your choices and are committed to providing you with a transparent and secure browsing experience.
Notifications